Every step of your derivation, checked by computer algebra. A counterexample when it breaks. An honest abstention when it can't be settled.
Your LaTeX, your macros. Or a photo of the whiteboard.
Symbolically, then confirmed numerically — integrals, matrices, branch cuts, units. Both must agree.
Not a wall of red — the step, and the values that break it.
Symbolic, numeric, interval, and a second CAS — run independently on every claim. One dissent and the step abstains rather than guesses.
Reduces lhs − rhs in closed form.
simplify → 0Samples it again, at 30 digits.
1.570796326795Encloses the difference in a ball — no luck involved.
0 ∈ enclosureA different algebra system, asked the same question.
Maxima agreesInvite-only while it's built with working researchers in photonics and mathematical physics. Tell us what you're deriving.
Request accessOr just write to a.faghihifar@gmail.com